Teachers’ Perceptions of the Implementation of Disability Friendly Learning in Inclusive Classrooms
PDF

Keywords

Disability Friendly Learning
Inclusive Education
Inclusive Pedagogy
Teacher Perception
Universal Design for Learning

How to Cite

Rakhman, N. A. (2025). Teachers’ Perceptions of the Implementation of Disability Friendly Learning in Inclusive Classrooms. SHINE: Journal of Special Needs, Holistic Interventions, and Neurodiversity in Education, 1(1), 30–37. Retrieved from https://ejournalvidyasubhaga.com/index.php/SHINE/article/view/58

Abstract

Background: Inclusive education emphasizes equitable participation for students with disabilities within regular classrooms through adaptive pedagogy, accessible environments, and collaborative learning culture. Although inclusive policies have expanded globally, many schools continue to struggle with translating disability-friendly principles into sustainable classroom practices, particularly in resource-limited contexts where teachers rely on empathy and intuitive adaptation.

Aims: This study aimed to explore teachers’ perceptions of disability-friendly learning implementation in inclusive primary classrooms and to identify pedagogical, relational, and institutional factors influencing inclusive practice.

Methods: A qualitative case study was conducted at a public primary school involving two classroom teachers and one principal selected purposively. Data were collected through classroom observations, semi-structured interviews, and document analysis, and were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis to identify patterns of accessibility, instructional adaptation, interaction dynamics, and institutional support.

Result: The findings indicate that teachers demonstrated strong empathy and adaptive strategies; however, inclusive practice remained constrained by limited infrastructure, insufficient professional training, absence of specialist support, and reliance on intuitive instructional adjustments rather than structured pedagogical frameworks.

Conclusion: Disability-friendly learning emerges as a dynamic process shaped by teacher agency, collaborative school culture, and systemic readiness, highlighting the need for sustainable professional development, accessible learning design, and policy alignment to foster meaningful participation.

PDF

References

Ainscow, M. (2020). Promoting inclusion and equity in education: Lessons from international experiences. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 6(1), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2020.1729587

Avramidis, E., & Norwich, B. (2019). Teachers’ attitudes towards inclusive education: A systematic review. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 34(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2019.1628337

De Boer, A., Pijl, S. J., & Minnaert, A. (2018). Students’ attitudes towards peers with disabilities: A review of the literature. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 65(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2018.1432035

Sharma, U., Loreman, T., & Forlin, C. (2018). Measuring teacher efficacy to implement inclusive practices. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 18(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12441

Sokal, L., Woloshyn, D., & Funk-Unrau, S. (2020). Inclusive education in changing times: Teachers’ perceptions of supports and stressors. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 24(8), 833–848. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1522718

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 16(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2018.1548797

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in reflexive thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238

Hennink, M., Hutter, I., & Bailey, A. (2020). Qualitative research methods. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36171-8

Kallio, H., Pietilä, A.-M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: Developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(12), 2954–2965. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13031

Meyer, M. (2020). Qualitative research design: Toward conceptual clarity. Organizational Research Methods, 23(2), 243–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120938571

Tracy, S. J. (2020). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119390806

Bossaert, G., Colpin, H., Pijl, S. J., & Petry, K. (2020). Truly included? A literature study focusing on the social dimension of inclusion in education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 24(7), 675–690. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1427157

Deppeler, J. M., Loreman, T., & Smith, R. (2021). Inclusive education in policy, practice and research. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.1230

Graham, L. J., Medhurst, M., Malaquias, C., & Tancredi, H. (2018). Fundamental concepts of inclusive education. Oxford Review of Education, 44(4), 398–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2018.1455074

Schwab, S. (2019). Teachers’ student-specific self-efficacy in relation to teacher and student variables. Teaching and Teacher Education, 82, 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.03.009

Zee, M., & Koomen, H. M. Y. (2016). Teacher self-efficacy and its effects on classroom processes, student academic adjustment, and teacher well-being. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 981–1015. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626801

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 SHINE: Journal of Special Needs, Holistic Interventions, and Neurodiversity in Education